Can we Bank on it?
Wednesday, September 21st, 2011
Investors are waiting in line for the opportunity to buy REO packages they can fix up to sell or rent out…but…Fannie Mae says there are no plans to offer them to these investors. Put in the hands of investors, to sell or rent out, leads to more jobs. Isn’t that a good idea? Homes priced where first time buyers can get in a home, not a worthwhile idea?
And BOFA, with Buffet’s $5 billion infusion, after the enormous bank bail out…what are they up to? Oh, payback for all the help? Cutting 30,000 jobs…that’s the pay back? You OK with that?
And Barney and the boys want to make the banks more accountable, offering them more ‘Regs’ that slow the whole process down and increase the cost to do business, screwing up the economy more yet…what the hay? Barney wanted to “roll the dice a little longer,” back in 2003. Apparently, the Fed and other powers did too? A 30 page paper written by analyst, Josh Rosner, after his research of nearly a decade and after he read the study by Graham Fisher & Co., pointed out that the reckless underwriting at that time, would lead to a catastrophe of enormous proportion in the years ahead. He wrote that this would lead to run-away prices in the housing market that would then lead to negative equity, most folks would not be able to withstand. Did Barney and his cohorts take heed? How about Fannie Mae, did anyone there take this seriously? Well, at least one person read it. But, then, she made an angry call to Graham Fisher & Company, harping that they were messed up and that they should have called her at Fannie (she is Jayne Shontell, and was head of investor relations at Fannie), before it got around. She’s probably since then, made an apology call to them and commended them on their insight? Yeah, right!
Care to know more? Read pages 219 - 237 of “Reckless Endangerment,” in fact, read the whole book, you’ll be glad you did! Get the names of many of the other “Playa’s,” Playa’s that played with our money, not theirs, Playa;s that made big time money in the game, and it was a game!
I just read in the WSJ, that 500,000 foreclosures are sitting on the bank’s books now…and…it’s estimated that 4 to 5 million home owners are now more than 90 days delinquent. What’s your best guess…how many of these home owners will pull it out, survive this financial dilemma? My best guess is 5% to 10%. Ask any bank auditor what they think.
Have they learned from past mistakes? FHA will now go as high as 52% for the debt to income ratio, used to underwrite a mortgage, provided, the applicant has good credit. You OK with that? Let’s look at a scenario. Take a couple with two kids, making a combined income of $75k/yr. 52% of that = $39k/yr. But that’s on gross wages. If they pay just 10% for Fed and State income taxes, they have $5,625/mo, less $2,925/mo for their mortgage payment and all other debt = $2,700 left over for all other living costs. If their health and life Ins. is no more than $1k/mo, utilities no more than $200/mo, food for four no more than $800/mo (USDA moderate budget), $125/mo for auto Ins., they still have $575/mo left for; auto and home upkeep, clothes, school supplies and or tuition, entertainment, savings, vacation, emergencies…get the picture?
So, the game is still on…what were they thinking then, what are they thinking now?
There is some good news though; if you can buy real estate now, there is a huge inventory of “Super Deals” out there today, and will be for years to come.
What do you think? We’d love to hear from you.
Ed

So much has been written about the housing market problem; who’s to blame, why’d it happen, on and on. What we haven’t seen much of is the fact that during the “bubble,” mtge lenders were allowing a buyer to have a 61% debt to income ratio. All their debts, added to the new mtge they were contemplating (mtge payment, interest, taxes and insurance), could be 61% of their gross income.
Picture this…main watering hole for the agents of a large Brokerage office…”Happy Hour!” The agents are having a drink and sharing their weekly war stories. Let’s listen in:
When you start working with an agent, if you’re happy with them, have them set up all showings and situations for you. That’s the only way they can get paid. Don’t hand over the pay to some agent you don’t even know, who hasn’t done a thing for you. And, if you do look at a home while in the search process, if the showing agent does not ask you if you are represented by another agent, let your agent know about it…the showing agent is either derelict in their procedure or unethical or plain stupid? Would you want to reward someone like that?

